Animal Testing in Australia

Animal testing is legal in Australia, which has a similar approach to many other westernised countries around the world. There are, however, numerous laws that serve to protect animal welfare during the experimentation process. Different areas in Australia have their own laws that are applicable to animal testing. Regardless, any animal testing that occurs in Australia must be approved prior to commencement in a laboratory facility. An educated and appropriate professional must perform the approval. Furthermore, the request for approval must meet a range of conditions and requirements prior to its approval.
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
In Australia, the NHMRC has created a special code of practice for the care of animals that are to be used in scientific experiments. This code forms the basis for all animal testing practices that are utilized in Australia. Ultimately, the code aims to ensure that animal testing is performed humanely, ethically, respectfully and with the purpose of safeguarding animal welfare at all times. The code itself is applicable to investigators, teachers and Animal Ethics Committees. It covers all areas for the care and use of animals as well as any interaction that occurs with animals. A major focus encompasses the justifiable aspect of animal testing. This means that significant justification must be shown for the use of an animal in testing. The code also outlines the responsibilities of those conducting research that requires animal testing.
National Animal Welfare Bill
The National Animal Welfare Bill was created in 2005 to meet the demands of both the public and the scientific research community. The bill was introduced to promote good animal testing practices that abide by the appropriate ethics, responsibility and care that the public and scientific community demand and expect. The bill focuses on all species used and outlines the standards expected for all researchers to understand and utilize. The hope is that the bill leads to a law within Australia, rather than its current state of a code.
Cosmetics Testing
The testing of cosmetics makes up a very small percentage of animal testing in Australia. Public opinion and debate regarding animal testing for cosmetics has, however, prompted a stronger and more consistent focus on refinement, reduction and replacement techniques in animal testing. It should be noted that there is an increasing use of human subjects for cosmetics testing now. Still, organisations in Australia who are against animal testing are particularly adamant that cosmetics testing should not, under any circumstances, be performed on animals. They argue that the efficacy of most ingredients used in cosmetics formulations today have already been proven and that human subjects should form the basis for cosmetics testing.
The Australian Society of Cosmetic Chemists (ASCC) is a collective of chemists who believe that there are safety reasons to warrant animal testing on cosmetics but that alternatives will be used whenever possible. The society believes in reducing the number of animals used, replacing animals with non-animal models whenever appropriate and lowering the level of suffering.
Controversy Over Animal Testing
Australia is still consumed with controversy over animal testing, which reflects the debate in many other parts of the world. Public opinion is similar to the attitudes of those in Britain, where support for cosmetics testing on animals is virtually non-existent. In Britain, however, animal testing for cosmetics purposes has been banned for approximately a decade now and given public support for the ban, it is unlikely that it will change in the future. Australia shares Britain's focus on alternative methods to animal testing but comparatively, its approach is overall less regulated.
Re: Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons
I’m gonna rule the world just y’all wait 28 sept 2022 just you wait
Re: What Happens to Animals After Testing?
All laboratories who test animals must Close
Re: Who Performs Animal Testing?
Testing animals is the most cruel act. Testing animals must stop.
Re: Cats and Dogs Used for Testing
Animal testing on cats and dogs is not acceptable. In Biology textbooks at school, pupils read new drugs are tested on human…
Re: Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons
As someone who has throbbing cock all day long (and trust me when I say this, my cock is throbbing right now…
Re: Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons
I am a Sketchlord I am a Sketchlord I am a Sketchlord I am a Sketchlord I am a Sketchlord I am a Sketchlord I…
Re: Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons
Oh so you're gay? Name every gay person. 1 : your mom 2 : your mom 3 : your mom 4 : your mom 5 :…
Re: Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons
I, an atheist, accidentally said “oh my g*d” instead of “oh my science” You read the title, I just cannot…
Re: Facts About Animal Testing
Animal testing is barbaric sadistic depraved and heartless there needs to be another way of testing like all the people in prisons…
Re: What Happens to Animals After Testing?
This article is beyond fabricated. How someone can sit behind a screen and type out an entire article glorifying and…