Animal Rights Activists Targeting Scientists
Although polls show that most of the public support peaceful animal rights protests, there are unfortunately a number of groups that use aggressive, intimidating tactics to attack or threaten scientists who conduct animal testing. Sadly, these activists put a dark cloud over the other individuals who are against animal testing but show their opinions through peaceful means.
Recent Animal Rights Activism and Intimidation
When most of us think about aggressive animal rights activism, we probably imagine that activists are targeting scientists who are conducting experiments on non-human primates, dogs or similar species. In a recent event, this was far from the case. In the United States, a bomb exploded on the front porch of a neuroscientist in California, while his family was sleeping inside the home. To further add to the incident, a second scientist had his car burned and a third received a threatening phone call.Yet, all of the scientists study brain development using mice and fruit flies, not the larger mammals that we might expect would spur the angry actions of animal rights activists. The incidents are all part of a bigger issue, which has seen the past year and a half involving vandalism and aggression directed at a number of researchers in California. It is particularly ironic if you consider that the Animal Liberation Front cite that all creatures have a right to life and liberty.
Protecting Scientists and Researchers from Activists
The issue of protection has now become a major one. In fact, it is also an expensive one because protection is quite costly and challenging to provide to scientists and researchers who conduct research through the use of animal testing. Researchers and scientists now have to fear for their lives and the lives of their families, while they attempt to complete research that is meant to improve the quality of human life.When unethical animal testing does occur, these isolated incidents are jumped on by animal rights groups and then exaggerated and inaccurately reported to further their cause. The vast majority of scientists and researchers care about animals and they conduct animal testing and research under strict regulations in Britain and North America.
Here in Britain, there has been somewhat of a decrease in aggressive, illegal animal rights activism. At one point, animal rights activists were targeting the computers and data of scientists but changes to security and data protection have helped to prevent these kinds of occurrences. However, the controversy and anger has not disappeared and there are still those activists who are prepared to commit illegal acts with the idea that their actions are justifiable in the goal of saving animal lives and reducing animal suffering.
Protecting Scientists by Condemning Aggressive Activism
Ultimately, aggressive animal rights activists do not truly draw light to the plight of animals. Instead, they only lose their credibility by harming human life, which is ironic given that they are protesting against the suffering and loss of animal life. Hopefully, the public and law enforcers will continue to approach aggressive and illegal activism with disdain. Instead, perhaps animal rights activists can find peaceful and effective ways to reduce animal experimentation and protect animals.- Scientists Against Animal Testing
- Pet Foods and Animal Testing
- Changing British Attitudes on Animal Testing
- Replacing Animal Tests With Stem Cells
- Suffering of Lab Animal Technicians
- Rapid Information Sharing to Reduce Animal Tests
- Using Biochips Instead of Animals for Testing
- Human Infections from Animal Testing Labs
- Improving Transparency in British Animal Testing


Re: Food Production and Animal Testing
You would have to grow the food yourself and not use pesticides. Industrially farmed veg is sprayed with pesticides which…
Re: Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons
Do they animal test on chimpanzees cause DNA?
Re: Who Performs Animal Testing?
Animal Testing and Experimenting is most Barbaric. 96% of all the results fail, and can't be used on Humans. A hundred and fifteen…
Re: Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons
While some animal testing is not ok you also have to look at the bright side of this. Because of animal…
Re: Biomedical Research and Animal Testing
Animals don’t have much of a life than humans they also have a shorter time span than humans
Re: What Happens to Animals After Testing?
In 2004, the FDA estimated that 92 percent of drugs that pass preclinical tests, including “pivotal” animal tests,…
Re: What Happens to Animals After Testing?
I entirely disagree with all animal experiments. They are archaic and hideously cruel. They cannot express pain like…
Re: Who Performs Animal Testing?
In regards to animal testing by the MoD medical equipment mainly field dressings and celox gauze is tested on live animals that…
Re: What Happens to Animals After Testing?
Is animal testing inhumane and cruel? Of course. But for example, let's say that someone has diabetes and the only…
Re: Animal Testing in the United States
I have degrees in chemistry and physics and have done cancer research before in the U.S. but stopped because drugs…