Using Biochips Instead of Animals for Testing

Given that the cosmetics sector in Europe will experience a ban on animal testing to be phased in by 2009, new ways of testing cosmetics will become even more important. Not only that, but new approaches to testing can also mean reduced animal testing for medical purposes.
The most recent development is an exciting one because it can allow a very quick analysis to provide assurance that a cosmetic product is safe for human use. A biochip is made up of more than one thousand human cell cultures. Suspended in a special three-dimensional gel and utilised on a slide to be viewed under the microscope, an individual cell culture can investigate if a specific chemical is toxic to humans. With the biochip, researchers can use this technology to find out if certain chemicals irritate the skin or cause toxicity in humans.
Extending the Uses of a Biochip
Even more exciting news about the biochip is that scientists can add in other kinds of cells. In this way, a researcher could add in a lung cell, for instance, which would then check if the chemical is toxic to lungs. This new technology now allows for scientists to assess the toxicity of a chemical on multiple organs, rather than just skin alone.With important legislation that mandates the use of toxicity testing for drugs and metabolites in the chemical industry, the biochip will allow drug companies to quickly analyse chemicals and determine how their metabolites affect human cells. The biochip also carries other benefits such as a reasonable cost, rapid output and of course, it does not require the use of animals for testing. By addressing the issues of how a drug affects different body cells as well as how toxicity may occur once the human body metabolises the drug, the biochip is a promising alternative to animal testing.
Screening for Drug Effectiveness
Perhaps the most beneficial aspect of a biochip is that it could eventually allow people to have a drug assessed against their precise genome prior to actually ingesting the drug. This means that if it became affordable to sequence the genes of every person, we could assess how a person will react to a certain drug. In this sense, we would be screening a drug before it is actually provided for a person, which would allow medical professionals to find the safest and most effective dose for that particular individual. While these biochips primarily look for cell death or the inhibition of cell growth, it is hoped that they may eventually test for allergic reactions and other issues relating to the use of a chemical.Positive Steps to Reduce Animal Testing
While this new biochip is not yet a complete replacement for animal testing, it is an exciting and positive step in the right direction for the chemical industry and pharmaceuticals. Ultimately, it pulls us a bit closer to finding a way to replace animals in laboratory testing. We would be able to use this technology to assess the safety of a new product and make predictions about chemical toxicity for different patients. The result is good news for both humans and perhaps more so, the laboratory animals that are used for testing purposes.Business energy with a difference
Looking for better business energy options? Whether it’s advanced monitoring, new connections, or adjusting capacity, our sponsor, Purely Energy can help.
📞 Call 0161 521 3400 or simply send us your details below for a no-obligation chat.
Sponsored by Purely Energy
Purely kindly sponsors this site. They help businesses deal with all aspects from securing the lowest prices, capacity upgrades, usage monitoring using their proprietory software, Purely Insights, and many other aspects. Need help with your commercial energy? Enter your details below and they’ll get back to you.
- Animal Rights Activists Targeting Scientists
- Scientists Against Animal Testing
- Pet Foods and Animal Testing
- Changing British Attitudes on Animal Testing
- Replacing Animal Tests With Stem Cells
- Suffering of Lab Animal Technicians
- Rapid Information Sharing to Reduce Animal Tests
- Using Biochips Instead of Animals for Testing
- Human Infections from Animal Testing Labs
- Improving Transparency in British Animal Testing
Re: Controversy of Animal Testing
lebron
Re: Controversy of Animal Testing
Adolf Hitler
Re: Controversy of Animal Testing
Adolf Hitler
Re: Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons
“/8776)654 jay+;**&/8765*Bnmhn vh vh jyf5 76 *mhg(jnu87cj hchgfcgh kjh*75£ (l d
Re: Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons
i want to lick u :() GAHHHHHHH *mwa mwa mwa*
Re: Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons
Bru who actually talks about animal testing??
Re: What Happens to Animals After Testing?
I have a friend who lost a pet hamster with a tracking device on him and it showed on his phone that his hamster was…
Re: What Happens to Animals After Testing?
I think this is wrong! Imagine being born as a animal just to get tortured and then killed! THIS HAS TO STOP NOW!!
Re: History of Protests Against Animal Tests
I am veryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy against animal testing and it should be banned.you guys…
Re: History of Protests Against Animal Tests
This website is very useful for my English project. Thank you very much!!:)